Skip to main content

Posts

"curiouser and curiouser" cried Alice.....

"curiouser and curiouser" cried Alice..... Do you categorize people? I do. Oh there are many ways to pigeonhole the persons you meet from taste in music, art, food, drinks, activities, books, the list is huge. But I find myself focusing on just a few major (to me) differences in the persons I meet and those differences "make all the difference"........ What people talk about is important to me. I tend to divide people into two groups when listening to them speak. They are either materialist talkers or idea talkers. The material oriented will go on and on about their latest acquisition, describing same in great detail, be it a pair of shoes (find an excuse to disappear if you are trapped by one of these persons), a new car, a large screen television (the larger the screen, the more they will obsess over it), or even "this year's spring fashion color"! Unfortunately, most people fall into this category.  Then there is that much smaller group
Recent posts

Madame Defarge Returns

"It was the best of times, it was the worst of times, it was the age of wisdom, it was the age of foolishness, it was the epoch of belief, it was the epoch of incredulity, it was the season of Light, it was the season of Darkness, it was the spring of hope, it was the winter of despair... " Knit 1,  purl 1 ...........   We are living in interesting times. Mme. Defarge

LOOKING GLASS LEAKS????

LOOKING GLASS LEAKS???? "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, Than are dreamt of in your philosophy." --Hamlet to Horatio So there we were, about 6 of us, drinking wine (my favorite food group) and discussing "reality", and it got nasty (meaning interesting) and we DID agree that the word 'reality' could not be used since we could not agree on its meaning, and so we switched the focus to existence and we DID AGREE that everything in existence consists of energy- there are no solids and names were referenced (Cayce, Carroll, Edwards, Plato, Pythagoras...). Philosophers write ABOUT existence - its symptoms- which don't actually precisely define just what it is. While we did agree that this apparent space, this ether?, or perhaps this emptiness we inhabit is likely a hologram, we could not agree on its nature or its genesis and we argued the God stuff, some string theory and the latest explanation for what is-- that we are actually a computer